The
questions started out all very innocent, 'Are you a Catholic?' I
clicked the 'No' option. I didn't even know why they were appearing.
Vanity compelled me on. 'Do you believe in God?' There was no 'well
er...' option, so again I clicked 'No'. I liked this game. Much
better than the Bubble Witch Saga. I understood this one and, there
were no wrong answers. The display of thumbnail pictures to right
changed a little. Questions came thick and fast. And with each answer
the thumbnails changed. A light went on at question thirty, “Would
you have sex on a first date?” There were no options for 'I'm a
bloke you numpty, it's self-evident', or 'I'd wait until later rather
than cause a fuss in the restaurant.' Apparently I've joined a dating
App. The Galaxy is trying to organise my love life. When I first
switched it on it began talking behind my back and swiping
information from any Samsung device in range. It's siphoned my
Facebook profile and is putting it about Arezzo. Every answer ruled
out one market and opened up another. I know because Cinzia, Elena,
Daniella and half a dozen ladies of a certain age have seen my
profile and are barking up the wrong tree! That's what happened.
Honestly your honour.
Anyhow,
here's some post-modern self-referential bloggery. A peek into my
mailbox.
Is
Jonnie Falafel your real name? What's
this? The Spanish Inquisition? My real name is Alfonso Maria
Torquemada. That had to go? Pestered night and day with a name like
that! It's what happens when your sailor dad gets extended shore
leave in Santiago. Dark eyebrows and salsa dancing skills? Those
genes didn't emanate from Wolverhampton.
Why
Italy?
Classic mid-life crisis. Too many programmes of the 'No Going Back'
ilk. (Actually, they've mostly all gone back!) Over-indulgence in
'memoirs' like Annie Hawes Extra Virgin
about Liguria or that ex-Genesis drummer guy who wrote Driving Over lemons
about Andalusia. Mind you even the guy who wrote TheDark Heart of Italy still lives in Bologna after twenty years and sings the praises of
the Italian caffรจ.
Do
you miss England? Depends which
England. The rolling hills of the Yorkshire Dales. Riverside walks.
Lively market towns. A good pub. The eco-socialist republic of Hebden
Bridge. The ease with which things get done. Transparency of social
situations. Complex conversations. People. I miss all those things.
You can keep the coalition government, cutbacks, TV and the dull
uniformity of towns and cities.
Have
you thought about writing a book? Appeals
to the ego! An alternative living would come in handy too! Alas
nobody wants to pay anyone to write any more. The print market seems
to have dwindled to a handful of gazillion selling authors and Amazon
has depressed the price of books so much there's not much back-wash
to authors. I know hand held devices are the in thing, but I haven't
looked into electronic publishing beyond reading a few articles about
it. Writing isn't going to remedy anyone's economic straits.
What
does 'slow food vegan who knows you can't get an ought from an is'
mean? Slow Food principles
say food should be Good, Clean & Fair. Good, in the sense of good
quality and healthy. Clean in the sense of grown with minimal or no
use of pesticides & herbicides. Fair in that it should pay the
producers and distributors a living. Carlo Petrini founded the
movement to counter corporate food culture obscuring the connections
between food production and consumption.
Slow Food |
More
than a decade after reading Slow Food,
my thinking is more complicated. To begin with I mistook it for the
'Italian Way'. This isn't so. Whilst traditions of production are
stronger here, especially in Tuscany and Umbria, the general trend is
towards the same methods and bland-out of Northern Europe. The
problem of earning a living that small
producers face in say, Yorkshire, exists here too. And I tut-tut at
folks shopping baskets almost – but not quite - as much as I did
there! I can't claim the moral high ground. I love my Turkish tahini,
Dutch peanut butter and Argentinian avocados! Generally speaking, the
influence of the movement is exaggerated.
Some elements of it are deeply
conservative; about keeping a 'closed shop' on certain products or
methods (although I do understand that DOC classifications are one
way producers can maintain a living). I admire the the Genuino Clandestino – groups of young farmers and producers whose
guarantee of quality comes from the fact they they are local enough
to know and that you can visit and check them out when you want to.
Most simply cannot afford to buy into the organic or DOC closed
shops.
I looked at animals, domestic &
farmed (I mean farmed too! 'Farm animals' is a
euphemism). They have central nervous systems and an anatomy and
physiology quite like mine. It didn't seem rational that they
couldn't feel or suffer in similar ways. A sort of suffocating panic
came over me when I thought of the industrial scale of the suffering
and the slaughter. We are lucky enough live in a time and place of
plenty where, as an omnivorous species, we have the luxury to choose
what we eat. The penny dropped nearly thirty four years ago. You
don't have to participate.
Is
vegan what you are or
what you do? The dietary practice of eschewing products of animal
origin? Or something more? Veganism is just one response to the
industrial scale suffering of animals. One manifestation of the urge
towards compassion. Anyone doing anything to tip the balance in
favour of compassion should be applauded and encouraged. Indeed, in
utilitarian terms it's perfectly possible for a meat eater to do more
to alleviate animal suffering than a dietary vegan.
I'm not the perfect vegan. If someone
slaps a lump of butter in the middle of my risotto I eat it. Vegan
not possible - default to vegetarian. Take the Paris Exemption.
Animal rights philosopher Peter Singer does. Jeffrey Masson does. A
lot of vegans do.
There's
a general confusion about matters of fact and matters of value. For
example, it's argued that because we have canine teeth we are
designed to eat meat. Others counter that because we have a long
digestive tract we are natural herbivores. But even if we were
designed to eat meat, it doesn't automatically follow that we should
or ought to eat meat. We
might equally conclude that we should suppress our nature in order to
alleviate animal suffering or for some other moral
reason. Vice versa for t the
long tract persuaded. The ought doesn't
logically follow from the is.
And
sometimes a reader writes for advice.....
I'm
thinking of moving to Italy.... Come
and stay for a few months. Maybe try out some different settings,
learn a bit about the culture and language, look at work options.
Then retreat to a safe distance and make a rational decision.
And
it's not all flattery...
Your tone is very cynical. I would
admit to being sceptical. I enjoy irony. I'm the same person I was in
England and I didn't Pollyanna around in a beatific haze saying all
was rosy in the garden there either.
Your views about Italy are ignorant
and bad mannered. When I write about iniquities I can be
ill-tempered and bad mannered. Foreigners have different
perspectives. For example, Bill Brysons travelogues of Britain are
entertaining because he's an outsider. Insiders sometimes don't see
the wood for the trees. The lake of my ignorance is much deeper and
wider than the puddle of my knowledge. This isn't modesty, but the
human condition. I prefer it when someone makes this kind of
criticism if they would tell me on which points I am mistaken. A
real exchange of views is preferable and I might even be persuaded.
Everyone is free to comment on the blog. I moderate the comments but
all views are welcome. I remove commercial content if it's not
relevant.
No comments:
Post a Comment